🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who comprehends this complex system? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Nor the typical worker. Selecting the right healthcare insurance for our business – or for households – seems like demands advanced expertise in medical insurance.

The Medical System Is More Than Complex, It Is Expensive

Based on a recent study, the average family spends $twenty-seven thousand annually for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). The average employer health insurance cost is projected to exceed $17,000 for each worker in 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Now federal operations has ceased functioning because political disagreements regarding tax credits which analysts predict will lead to a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I have to believe we're approaching that point since this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm proposing for our current Medicare program – an insurance system – merely extend to cover everyone. The existing system remains intact. How our healthcare providers get paid changes. Believe me, they will adjust.

The Way National Health Insurance Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from workers and companies. In similar programs, a worker making average wages must contribute approximately five point three percent toward medical coverage. Their employer must contribute approximately 13.75%.

Does this seem expensive? Unless you contrast that with what average US resident spends. I know multiple clients who are easily contributing between 8% to 15% of their employee wages for medical benefits. And keep in mind that in inclusive programs, these contributions also cover pension plans, illness coverage, maternity leave and job loss protection in addition to supporting medical services. When you add those costs versus what we pay for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Implementation in the US

In the US, a national health premium would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a framework already established. It should be means-based – those at higher income levels would pay more than lower-income earners. This includes both worker and employer contribution. And, like many our government's defense, IT, social programs and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced to third-party administrators rather than a government office.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program represents a huge benefit for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would place us on a level playing field against big corporations that can pay for better plans. It would render management much easier (a payroll deduction remitted like social security and Medicare taxes, instead of separate payments to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would make it easier for us to budget annual expenditures, rather than enduring the complex (and ineffective) theater of bargaining with the big insurance providers that we must do every year. Due to simplification, there would be improved comprehension about benefits among workers – as opposed to the current system where they have to interpret the complexities of current options. Additionally there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for companies since we wouldn't have access to workers' medical records for weighing risks and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as possible. However I recognize that public institutions has a significant role in our lives, from providing defense to supporting needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage to all through a national insurance system enhances our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, simpler approach for small businesses which hire more than half of the country's workers and generate half the economic output. It makes it possible for workers to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Are there numerous factors I haven't covered? Of course there are. But with all the healthcare cost increases we've seen recently, it's evident that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning effectively. And I realize that we're not a compact European nation where major reforms can be readily adopted. But expanding universal Medicare, despite increased taxation required, would still be a superior and less expensive approach both for controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Need for Honest Assessment

As Americans, we need to reduce our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't so great. The US places well below many other countries in healthcare quality globally, based on comprehensive research. Perhaps a bright spot in this present circumstances could be that we undertake serious examination at ourselves and acknowledge that big changes need to happen.