🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “total contradiction” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

A letter obtained by media originating from the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the country’s government ministers demands proposals to prohibit tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be scrapped or postponed.

The tobacco firm seeks amendments to a proposed legislation that include decreasing the suggested dimensions of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavoured tobacco products, and watered-down penalties for any firms breaking the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“Were I in government, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” said the health advocate.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year die from smoking-associated diseases, according to global health agency statistics.

The campaigner stated the letter was believed to have been distributed to various ministerial offices and was in circulation among civil society groups.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

This occurs during expanded apprehension about corporate intervention with health policies. In recent weeks, global health authorities sounded an alarm that the cigarette manufacturers was escalating campaigns to weaken global control measures.

“We see evidence of business advocacy worldwide. Corporate signatures are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN high-level meeting,” commented Jorge Alday.

Likely impacts

“Should anti-smoking legislation isn’t passed because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in human lives who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation going through Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and requiring that visual health alerts cover 75% of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Via documentation, the company recommends this be reduced to less than half “within the WHO-FCTC suggested parameters”, delayed for at least twelve months after the bill passes.

Global health authorities specifically advises a warning should cover at least 50% of the cigarette package face “and seek to occupy as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings are required to occupy nearly two-thirds of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Scented product controversy

The corporation requests the elimination of comprehensive limitations on scented smoking items, arguing that it would push consumers toward “illicitly sold” products. The company proposes restricting fewer varieties of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The draft bill recommends punishments for multiple violations “ranging from a fraction of annual sales to ten-year jail sentences”.

Corporate defense

Through correspondence, the company executive of the Zambian branch states the corporation is focused on ethical business practices” and “supports the objectives of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the associated health impact” but claims that “specific rules can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Critic response

The advocate stated the company's suggested modifications would “dilute these regulations so much that the impact needed for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that many such provisions were present in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “total double standard”, he stated.

“We exist in a international community. If I plant tobacco in my back yard and collect the yield and sell it out – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to profit individually and all the subsequent offspring while my community's youth are dying … is in itself absolute spiritual collapse.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the United Kingdom or other countries had not resulted in corporate closures, Chimbala said. “Regulations don't close the industry. It only protects the people.”

Formal company response

The company representative stated: “The corporation runs its activities following with relevant national regulations. Moreover, the corporation engages in the country’s legislative process in line with the relevant frameworks which provide for interested party involvement in legislation creation.”

The corporation remained “not resisting legislation”, the spokesperson stated, adding that young individuals should be protected from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We support progressive regulation to achieve intended population health targets, while recognizing the range of privileges and responsibilities on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the spokesperson stated, noting that the company's suggestions “reflect the realities of the local commercial environment and tobacco industry, which encompasses growing volumes of black market activity”.

Zambia’s department of trade, commerce and industry was approached for comment.